On May 17, the case of Mo Huanjing, the party of the “nanny arson case†in Hangzhou, was heard in the second court of the Zhejiang Higher People's Court.
On February 9, the court of first instance sentenced Mo Huanjing to death and renounced political rights for life. Mo Huanjing pleaded guilty, but argued that he never thought about burning the hostess and other victims. It refused to accept the judgment and appealed.
In the court hearing yesterday, Mo Huanjing admits the mistake, but has repeatedly argued that the arson is only to attract the attention of the employer, and the consequences of the evil are not what he expected. In addition, the firefighters at the scene of the incident first appeared in court to testify on the disposal of the day. Due to the seriousness of the case, the court announced at 5.20 pm that the case will be pronounced.
The "nanny arson" incident was issued on June 22, 2017. At 5 o'clock in the morning, the fire broke out in the residential building of Hangzhou Blue Qianjiang District. The hostess and three young children were killed. Nanny Mo Huanjing was detained on suspicion of arson. He was later prosecuted for arson and theft.
Mo Huanjing claims that “the first sentence was severely sentenced and requested to be sentencedâ€
At 9 o'clock on the 17th, the "Hangzhou Nanny Arson" was heard in the Zhejiang High Court. At 9:05, Mo Huanjing entered the courtroom. She cut a pair of short shoulders with black hair and a black round neck long sleeve top.
Mo Huanjing pleaded guilty, but the consequences of the case were not what he wanted to see.
According to the situation report issued by the Zhejiang Higher People's Court, Mo Huanjing's appeal mainly includes: the first trial found that it used a lighter to ignite the book to ignite the flammable items such as the living room sofa and curtains, and escaped to the outside after the fire broke out and the facts did not match; At that time, the responsibility of the property and public security fire department was not considered; after the incident, it was waiting at the scene. The first interrogation was to truthfully confess the facts of the crime and have a frank plot; the first instance was severely sentenced and requested to be sentenced.
In this trial, Mo Huanjing acknowledged the theft of the first-instance, saying that gambling began in 2012, and theft was caused by losing money.
Mo Huanjing also admitted to the fact of arson, arguing that he was very good with the victim family. The ignition was because the gambling lost money in the early morning of the day, he wanted to fire a little fire and tried to borrow money again. He prepared the bucket in advance and tried to use water to fire but was nervous. The wrestling failed, and the girl’s window glass was struck with a hammer, the phone was alarmed, the security was called for help, and Lin Shengbin was notified by phone.
It is worth noting that at 4:55 on the day of the incident, Mo Huanjing ignited, and Zhu Xiaoyu called her at 5:4. At the first trial, Mo Huanjing said that he would go to the kitchen to take a pre-prepared bucket to extinguish the fire in the 9 minutes, but fell over the middle of the tension.
In this trial, Mo Huanjing proposed that after the fall, he “feeled a dizzy, eyes closed for a whileâ€, and later in the photo taken by the detention center, it showed bruises and blood on his head. This is something that was not mentioned in the previous transcript.
The prosecution asked this question, why did it take only one year to make this content? Mo Huanjing said that he went back to the scene a few days ago and remembered.
The Beijing News reporter was informed that a few days before the trial, the defender applied to organize Mo Huanjing to identify the scene, and re-examine the position of the glass at the head of the hammer. After the court agreed, Mo Huanjing entered the scene for the first time after the incident.
A number of firefighters appeared in court to recover from the incident
According to the defender's application, the collegial panel summoned four firefighters involved in the fire to testify.
The first batch of firefighters Wu and Huang, who entered the fire, testified that at 5:17 on the same day, the first batch of six firefighters from the Omi River squadron carried the equipment into the fire building, and then took the elevator under the leadership of the security guard to arrange the water gun on the 17th floor. When I learned that there was someone in the room, I used the indoor fire hydrant to connect the water belt to the internal attack. I searched the nanny room to the kitchen. When the internal attack was pushed to the kitchen, Huang found that the water pressure began to drop and could not meet the fire fighting needs.
Mo Huanjing mentioned that he was brought to the first floor by the security guard and met the firefighters at the elevator. She said that she had communicated with the other party and handed the room card to the other party, saying that she was the nanny on the 18th floor, but the other party did not pick up the room card and did not let her go to the elevator.
Wu said that he had no impression and had no exchanges. He said that there were six firefighters carrying equipment in the elevator, and the security, the space was already very cramped, and the situation was urgent.
The witness Song Moumou said that he led three fire fighters to form an internal attack group. He stressed that due to insufficient water pressure, he chose to use the water belt laid along the stairs to extinguish the fire with a water gun. Later, he found four trapped people on the north side of the bed in the east room, ordered the firefighters to undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediately sent them to the rescue. car.
Zhao Mou, the former firefighter of the lakeside squadron who participated in the rescue, also mentioned that the water belt was laid on the day of the incident, and then the water gun was used to transfer the trapped people to the fire scene on the 18th floor. When entering the room, they saw four people who had no life reaction. Sleepy people.
Property changes fire pump from manual to automatic
At 1155 hours, the presiding judge announced an adjournment and continued to sit at 12:45. According to the application of the defender, the staff of the Greentown Property of the property management enterprise of the case was present to testify in court.
Mo Huanjing's defense lawyer and Beijing Huayi Law Firm Tong Zongjin introduced that the most important content of the property liability in the trial was the failure of the fire pump to pressurize, which resulted in no water that could be used to meet the fire protection needs during the rescue. Property staff members appear in their personal capacity and they all deny responsibility.
The situation report issued by the Zhejiang Higher People's Court showed that Wang Moumou said that at 5:10 on the day of the incident, he learned that the 18th floor of the 2nd Qianjiang Community was on fire. He immediately drove to the scene and telephoned Wei of the engineering department to check. Whether the facility is functioning properly.
He also mentioned that the property usually checks the fire pump once a month. The last inspection before the incident was in May. At the time of the incident, there was a lawn on the fire lane, and the firefighters went to the pump room to check. For the fire pump at the time of manual opening, it said that Wei will open the fire pump remotely after the manual mode is changed from manual to automatic.
Wei, a property worker on duty that day, said that he was in the dormitory, and Wang Moumou, deputy manager of the engineering department, called. It rushed to the pump room for more than ten minutes, went to check whether the fire pump was running normally, and changed the starting state of the pump from manual opening to automatic opening. It means that the fire pump is automatic under normal conditions.
The prosecution does not recognize Mo Huanjing’s self-confidence
In the court debate session yesterday afternoon, Mo Huanjing argued that the consequences of four deaths and major property losses were not what he wanted.
The defender stated that Mo Huanjing did not pursue or even object to the death of the victim. It usually has a good relationship with the employer. Although there is a theft but it has not been discovered, the ignition is not to destroy the evidence of the theft, and the ignition at 5 o'clock in the morning is to know that the hostess gets up at around 5 o'clock every day.
Secondly, Mo Huanjing implemented the firefighting behavior objectively. The confession had wanted to take a bucket to fight the fire. He tried to knock on the glass with a hoe. After he went downstairs, he did not stop the rescue. He told the people present and called the police. He also asked to go upstairs with the firefighters and wanted to hand over the house card to the firefighters.
In addition, the factors of defects in the property fire protection facilities must be objectively considered, and the fire water gun pressure is insufficient to delay the fire extinguishing time. This unconventional defect expands the fire consequences. After Mo Huanjing committed the crime, he stayed at the scene of the community and took the initiative to confess the facts of arson, which constituted a plot of surrender.
The prosecution believes that Mo Huanjing proposed that the sentence is terrible and that the reason for requesting a change of judgment cannot be established. It is recommended to reject the appeal and maintain the original judgment.
The prosecution stated that Mo Huanjing’s arson behavior had a direct causal relationship with the death of four people and the serious consequences of major property losses, and he was criminally responsible for all consequences.
In spite of the personal and property safety of the victims and the residents in the high-rise residential buildings, Mo Huanqi tried to defraud the victim’s gratitude by setting fire and then extinguishing the fire, so that he could borrow money for gambling again. The criminal motive was despicable and the consequences were extremely serious. His frank and plot circumstances were controversial. In comparison, it is not enough to punish it lightly.
In addition, Mo Huanjing did not acknowledge the arson before the police checked his mobile phone. The police found a large number of arson and arson on his mobile phone. He thought that he was suspected of arson, and he did not confess the fact of arson when accepting the first interrogation. Surrender.
In the final presentation, Mo Huanjing pleaded guilty and repented, pleaded with the victim's family to accept his apology, and again stressed that the serious consequences were not what he wanted, and asked for a lighter sentence. If the second instance upheld the original judgment, it would be willing to accept it.
In view of the fact that the case is serious, the presiding judge announced that he will pronounce the date on another date.
dialogue
Lin Shengbin: "The civil lawsuit will be filed soon"
The Beijing News: What new evidence and defense opinions are there in this trial?
Lin Shengbin: In the morning, I mainly invited several first-time and second-generation firefighters to the scene to testify. The firefighters mentioned that there was insufficient water pressure at the site and could not control the fire. They also said that they knew someone in the fire when they received the police mission, but there were several people who were not clear at any position.
Beijing News: Does your appeal change?
Lin Shengbin: No change, I hope to maintain the original judgment, only to sentence Mo Huanjing to death and to abandon civil compensation.
Beijing News: When is it expected to file a civil lawsuit?
Lin Shengbin: When the criminal proceedings are over, a civil lawsuit will be filed soon. It is necessary to wait for a civil lawsuit to file a case to obtain some evidence.
The Beijing News: What has changed in your status since the first instance was pronounced?
Lin Shengbin: Re-entering in the work, busy will also divert some attention.
The Beijing News: What have you done in addition to the work in these three months?
Lin Shengbin: Go outside and do some public welfare. In March, I went to Daliangshan and Beichuan, and donated some supplies to the children of Daliangshan. After helping these children, I will feel better in my heart.
Beijing News reporter Gao Min Chang Zhuoyu Wang Hao Wang Wei
(Editor: Liu Wei HF113)
Bath Soap,Soap Facial Cleanser,Facial Cleanser Soap,Handmade Soap
Guangzhou Yilong Cosmetics Co., Ltd. , https://www.skinmelao.com